- From: Tab Atkins Jr. via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2024 22:52:13 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> I really think that spanning items should not contribute to the width of the columns in masonry. I disagree. Like, if you have `repeat(5, min-content)`, and an item spans two of those columns, we *do* want to make sure the track size is large enough that the two columns it spans will contain its min-content size. After all, the whole reason you *gave* it a span might be because you expected it to be large. If we don't contribute its size to the tracks, then it'll *happen* to work fine if it's min-content size is less than twice that of the non-spanning items, but it'll overflow if it *is* larger than double. That seems pretty bad. -- GitHub Notification of comment by tabatkins Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10053#issuecomment-2080209258 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Friday, 26 April 2024 22:52:14 UTC