- From: Tab Atkins Jr. via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2024 03:48:21 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> I am not talking about changing how it works now, but about a compromise that will enable masonry-type grids with spanning items. I will always take this limitation compared to the absence of a feature completely. As we outlined over in <https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/9041#issuecomment-2075210820>, spanning items and intrinsic tracks are totally fine perf-wise, *if* all the tracks are *the same* intrinsic size. (And spanning items across fixed/flexible tracks aren't problematic at all.) It's just when you mix an intrinsic track with some different-sized tracks (intrinsic or not) that you run into these issues. And so far, we haven't seen *any* example of Masonry grids that want to exceed that limitation - if they want intrinsic sizes, they want them all the same; if they want different sizes, they want fixed/flexible sizes, rather than intrinsic ones. So we should be just fine handling spanning items properly. -- GitHub Notification of comment by tabatkins Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10053#issuecomment-2080346785 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Saturday, 27 April 2024 03:48:22 UTC