- From: Chris Lilley via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2023 16:41:47 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> would filtering that supports `spec:css-writing-modes-3` (using the level if it's in the spec link) be enough? It is sufficient, but not ideal. One plus (given version-less directories) is that creating an implementation report for `css-foo-n` becomes possible without mixing in results from tests for `css-foo-n+1`. `feature:foo` is an improvement, certainly; because we want to find features that are poorly or inconsistently implemented. Two ways to create specific links to testable spec assertions are the `<link rel=help>` to link from test to spec, or alternatively the Bikeshed `<wpt>` element which contains links from spec to test. -- GitHub Notification of comment by svgeesus Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6896#issuecomment-1483100546 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Friday, 24 March 2023 16:41:49 UTC