- From: Philip Jägenstedt via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2023 17:48:15 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
@svgeesus my idea with `spec:css-writing-modes-3` was that directory names don't matter, only `spec` fields in `META.yml` files and in-test spec links like `<link rel=help href="precisespec#reference">`. But the results would only be as accurate as the metadata. Perhaps the most realistic use of levels would be to carefully fix the links for some next level features, to exclude those from an implementation report of current level spec. (To be able to exclude the _previous_ level features seems like far more work than I imagine anyone would be willing to spend, since that'd often be the majority of tests.) Getting links via Bikeshed `<wpt>` is an interesting idea though, the data isn't as close at hand as the WPT repo itself, but it doesn't require any impossible engineering feats. I'm glad that the `feature:foo` idea seems promising! It would also require a lot of metadata maintenance of course, but I think it'd be broadly useful. -- GitHub Notification of comment by foolip Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6896#issuecomment-1483189317 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Friday, 24 March 2023 17:48:16 UTC