- From: Noam Rosenthal via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2023 22:13:37 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> > > without changing your DOM > > I don't think this is the common use-case for the majority of developers, so I don't think it makes sense to complicate the common case to account for the uncommon case as long as we have a solution for the uncommon case as well. I wouldn't call `header > *` or `nav > a` or even `section:has(a:active)` an uncommon use-case. Supporting only IDs and classes are an oversimplification of CSS. But perhaps other people see this differently. btw I have no problem with such automagically-occurring simplification in frameworks that are a bit more opinionated than the web platform. -- GitHub Notification of comment by noamr Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/8319#issuecomment-1849103320 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Sunday, 10 December 2023 22:13:39 UTC