- From: Sebastian Zartner via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 09 Dec 2023 23:02:58 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> It just occurred to me that with keywords in the second parameter, `round()` _could_ also be a place to implement truly physical length measurements. #5986 #614 That's out of the scope of this issue, which is to make B optional in certain cases. So @Crissov, you might open a new issue to discuss your proposal. Though given https://wiki.csswg.org/faq#real-physical-lengths, before discussing any syntax proposals, you'd first have provide a solution for how to actually address physical sizes. Sebastian -- GitHub Notification of comment by SebastianZ Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/9668#issuecomment-1848774383 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Saturday, 9 December 2023 23:03:01 UTC