- From: Oriol Brufau via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 02 Dec 2023 01:09:04 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Loirooriol has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts: == [css-values] Let B default to 1 in `round(<strategy>?, A, B)` == I get the reasoning for requiring a precision in most cases. However, as I mentioned in https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2513#issuecomment-565426050, it seems fine to omit it for numbers. So if B becomes optional, defaulting to 1, it will be possible to do things like ```css round(2.3) /* 2 */ round(up, 2.3) /* 3 */ ``` while `round(2.3em)` will continue being invalid due to the type mismatch between A and B. Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/9668 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Saturday, 2 December 2023 01:09:06 UTC