- From: Daniel Holbert via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2023 00:06:14 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
FWIW, here's a testcase showing what non-default `align-self/justify-self` currently does, for several children of a grid with `auto` insets (top half) vs. `0` insets (bottom half): https://jsfiddle.net/dholbert/7fze6aLt/ I think Gecko, WebKit, Blink, and [Blink-with-new-grid-staticpos-behavior](https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/pull/40710#issuecomment-1661225661) all agree on the rendering of this testcase -- it looks like this: ![image](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/assets/426803/a0a460b7-280d-4bcf-9907-061dfa06dd7f) The top half seems clearly more-usefully-centered to me. And, taken literally, the proposed change here seems like it'd make the top half behave like the bottom half (since it'd make the used values of `auto` be `0` here), I think. I don't think that's the intent, so we need to be extra-clear about the expected outcome here. (E.g. there are various behaviors that are conditioned on whether or not the inset properties are `auto`, and we need to be explicit about which of those behaviors would still happen when we have an `auto`-that-we-are-treating-as-zero-due-to-this-proposal.) -- GitHub Notification of comment by dholbert Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/9124#issuecomment-1663116207 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 3 August 2023 00:06:15 UTC