- From: CSS Meeting Bot via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2023 00:00:35 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
The CSS Working Group just discussed `[selectors] Custom state pseudo class proposal`, and agreed to the following: * `RESOLVED: Change from -- to state` <details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary> <dael_> jarhar: I was working on getting this spec. Has :-- custom name syntax. Suggestion was :state instead of :-- for custom name. Turns out there was discussion in 2020<br> <dael_> jarhar: I don't have a strong opinion. I wish [missed] was here to state his case.<br> <jarhar> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2020May/0017.html<br> <dael_> jarhar: Previous resolution minutes ^<br> <dael_> astearns: Whatwg issue sounds like the idea is that it's more consistent with :part<br> <dael_> fantasai: oriol posted ac omment that :--was discussed for another kind of custom selector?<br> <fantasai> https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4805#issuecomment-1662763534<br> <dael_> TabAtkins: Yeah. For like saying :--heading that was eq. of h1, h2 etc. Having the clash isn't ideal, though doable<br> <dael_> astearns: Always favor a name over ascii gibberish to make it easier to see what you're trying to do. not a strong opinion<br> <dael_> TabAtkins: Looking at the discussion where we decided, looks like everybody was unenthusiastic. If we decide to revert to :state I think that's fine<br> <dael_> TabAtkins: Counter argument was from plinss who wanted it not to be too distinct. The --makes it look like a normal pseudo class. I don't have a big opinion<br> <dael_> astearns: We could resolve to change to :state which makes it easier to get through whatwg. plinss can raise a new issue if he chooses<br> <dael_> fantasai: I think it makes more sense. We use --names when declaring, but not when pulling information from another system. Makes sense to not use -- for this case from what I understand it to be<br> <florian> +1<br> <dael_> astearns: Anyone want to wait on a resolution to make sure plinss is on board?<br> <fantasai> seems more consistent with ::higlight() also<br> <dael_> astearns: Objections to changing from -- to state<br> <dael_> RESOLVED: Change from -- to state<br> <dael_> astearns: Thanks jarhar<br> </details> -- GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4805#issuecomment-1663111980 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 3 August 2023 00:00:36 UTC