W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-archive@w3.org > May 2021

Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-lists] Omitted start value of reversed list isn't calculated right (#6233)

From: Simon Pieters via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 19 May 2021 14:16:38 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-844148918-1621433797-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Actually, I'm not sure it works. What if the last element uses `counter-set` or `<li value>`? Right now with `<ol reversed>` that doesn't change the start value of the list.
```
<ol reversed>
<li>foo
<li>bar
<li value=5>baz
</ol>
```
Gives 3, 2, 5 in current Chrome/Safari/Firefox.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by zcorpan
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6233#issuecomment-844148918 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 19 May 2021 14:16:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 06:42:33 UTC