- From: Wesley Branton via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2021 23:41:30 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
I don't really agree with the logic. The same could be said for the "thin" option. When is there really a case where the author wants to control the scrollbar on a specific part of the website to make it thin? Just because there may not be a clear use case for it, doesn't mean that there isn't a use case. There's no real necessary use case for the "thin" option either, other than a designer's preference. Perhaps a website that sells glasses wants to have a larger scrollbar on parts of their website because it makes it more functional for people with vision impairments (their customer base). Perhaps a website designer wants to use a wider scrollbar on a long scrolling section to compensate for the fact that the height of the scrollbar thumb is shorter. Having a "wide" option offers some functional advantages for designers, as opposed to the "thin" option, which only has cosmetic advantages. -- GitHub Notification of comment by WesleyBranton Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6351#issuecomment-887904014 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 27 July 2021 23:41:31 UTC