- From: Mike Bremford via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 17:29:32 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
As this one is still being kicked around... We've been experimenting internally with a slightlly different approach, moving the "scoped" attribute from the `<style>` to the scope root, and allowing values of `none` (for no scoping), or `inherit` and `isolate` to control the lower-boundary: ```html <style> span { font-style: italic } </style> <div scoped="inherit"> <style> span { font-weight: bold } </style> <span>bold and italic</span> </div> ``` ```html <style> span { font-style: italic } </style> <div scoped="isolate"> <style> span { font-weight: bold } </style> <span>bold only</span> </div> ``` This is working well for our purposes (building up huge documents from many smaller ones with `<xi:include>`). We found for completeness we needed another value: `scoped=override`, which is added to a `<style>` to force the declarations to be applied even in an element with `scope="solate"` ```html <style scoped="override"> span { color: red } </style> <style> span { font-style: italic } </style> <div scoped="isolate"> <style> span { font-weight: bold } </style> <span>bold only, but also red</span> </div> ``` The need to impose upper and lower limits on the styles - scoping the scope, if you like - seems to be adding a lot of complexity, particularly when it's attempted from within the stylesheet itself (eg with @scope). It seems to me the decision on whether an element is a scope root belongs with the element itself, not with a stylesheet it includes. -- GitHub Notification of comment by faceless2 Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3547#issuecomment-692201884 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Monday, 14 September 2020 17:29:33 UTC