Re: [csswg-drafts] [selectors] Let :is() have better error-recovery behavior than normal Selectors (#3264)

The CSS Working Group just discussed `[selectors] Let :is() have better error-recovery behavior than normal Selectors`.

<details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary>
&lt;dael> Topic:  [selectors] Let :is() have better error-recovery behavior than normal Selectors<br>
&lt;dael> github: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3264<br>
&lt;dael> ericwilligers: We resolved to have better error recovery but WK shipped without and FF is about to. Is it too late or do we still want error recovery?<br>
&lt;dael> TabAtkins: If possible I'd like to have it. If we have to oh well, but it's bad behavior without<br>
&lt;dael> ericwilligers: Who wants to do spec update?<br>
&lt;dael> ericwilligers: We resolved on issue but spec isn't updated<br>
&lt;dael> TabAtkins: I'll do it if we agree today to proceed<br>
&lt;dael> Rossen_: We're wanting to hold previous resolution that requires error recovery and make that edit into spec? Or are we trying to relax the error recovery and not proceed with edits?<br>
&lt;dael> ericwilligers: [missed]<br>
&lt;dael> ericwilligers: I'm propsing the first, that we go ahead and make edit.<br>
&lt;dael> Rossen_: You're proposing add it to spec and pester impl to do that<br>
&lt;dael> ericwilligers: Yes<br>
&lt;astearns> notes that Emilio says he's OK implementing it<br>
&lt;dael> Rossen_: Alright. Any thoughts on that? Are we still committed and have TabAtkins add edits?<br>
&lt;dael> TabAtkins: We'd need FF or WK dev to be okay doing change<br>
&lt;dael> Rossen_: emilio is signaling he's fine with change. Only WK is going to be required to update. Anyone from WK on?<br>
&lt;dael> smfr: If emilio is fine changing we're fine changing<br>
&lt;dael> Rossen_: We have a resolution to do error recovery. Do we need resolution to have TabAtkins edit it in?<br>
&lt;dael> Rossen_: We'll close no change but to put in the required edits<br>
&lt;dael> Rossen_: Thank you<br>
</details>


-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3264#issuecomment-686088149 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Wednesday, 2 September 2020 23:20:50 UTC