W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-archive@w3.org > September 2020

Re: [csswg-drafts] [selectors] Let :is() have better error-recovery behavior than normal Selectors (#3264)

From: Tab Atkins Jr. via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2020 00:08:05 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-692382441-1600128484-sysbot+gh@w3.org> 
Yeah, unless I distinguish between "parsable, just using unknown selectors" and "lol wtf is this", I can't handle that.

And even then, a "parsable but unknown" selector might have complex specificity behavior, so we actually can't even predict that. So it's just something we'll have to accept.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by tabatkins
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3264#issuecomment-692382441 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 15 September 2020 00:08:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 06:42:16 UTC