W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-archive@w3.org > September 2020

Re: [csswg-drafts] [selectors] Let :is() have better error-recovery behavior than normal Selectors (#3264)

From: Tab Atkins Jr. via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 20:48:29 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-692305606-1600116508-sysbot+gh@w3.org> 
Cool, then please make sure the spec edits linked above are satisfactory; they apply to :is(), :where(), and :has(), but not :not(), per resolutions earlier in the thread.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by tabatkins
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3264#issuecomment-692305606 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Monday, 14 September 2020 20:48:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 06:42:16 UTC