W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-archive@w3.org > October 2020

Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-fonts-4] The spec should not allow UAs to ignore user-installed fonts (#5421)

From: Chris Lilley via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2020 11:11:05 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-705499742-1602155463-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
> Web fonts are the only sure way for a web author to use these less-supported languages. 

In general, using a Web font is more reliable *provided the license allows such use*. This is not the case for all fonts, including some which are "free to use" but are required to be distributed in an intact zip file with a readme and license, for example.

> Naming a specific font and hoping the user has it installed is less likely to work than using web fonts.

It is a very poor approach for Latin, agreed.

It is the _standard_ approach in some linguistic communities, because they came onto the Web well before Web fonts were a realistic thing to use. Thus, user-agents which suddenly stop working on content which has worked for one or two decades will simply be seen as broken.

GitHub Notification of comment by svgeesus
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5421#issuecomment-705499742 using your GitHub account

Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 8 October 2020 11:11:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 06:42:20 UTC