> So, for CSS Fonts 4 in particular, there should be no change to the specification in this area? It is good enough for the clreq editors, but I have also noticed that the Japanese layout TF chair (@kidayasuo) disagreed with the cursive-Kai mapping (whether the spec needs to be changed is another issue because of potential compatibility issues). In https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-japanese/2020AprJun/0089.html : > cursive が楷書にマップされるのは賛成できません。 which means "I don't agree that cursive should be mapped to Kai". -- GitHub Notification of comment by xfq Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4606#issuecomment-722119061 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-configReceived on Thursday, 5 November 2020 03:29:51 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 06:42:22 UTC