W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-archive@w3.org > June 2020

[csswg-drafts] [scroll-animations] The selector() function vs. similar cases (#5166)

From: andruud via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2020 08:24:20 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issues.opened-630615826-1591259059-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
andruud has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts:

== [scroll-animations] The selector() function vs. similar cases ==
Not necessarily a spec issue, I'm just wondering why the `source` descriptor currently accepts `selector(<id-selector>)`, rather than just `<id-selector>`.

I'm not implying that it doesn't make sense or that it's somehow very bad, I just want to ensure that we're as consistent across specs as we can be. In particular, [nav-up (etc)](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-ui-4/#nav-dir) accepts an `<id>` directly. (Are there other similar cases)?



Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5166 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 4 June 2020 08:24:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 06:42:09 UTC