- From: andruud via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2020 08:24:20 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
andruud has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts: == [scroll-animations] The selector() function vs. similar cases == Not necessarily a spec issue, I'm just wondering why the `source` descriptor currently accepts `selector(<id-selector>)`, rather than just `<id-selector>`. I'm not implying that it doesn't make sense or that it's somehow very bad, I just want to ensure that we're as consistent across specs as we can be. In particular, [nav-up (etc)](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-ui-4/#nav-dir) accepts an `<id>` directly. (Are there other similar cases)? Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5166 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 4 June 2020 08:24:22 UTC