W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-archive@w3.org > June 2020

Re: [csswg-drafts] [scroll-animations] The selector() function vs. similar cases (#5166)

From: Majid Valipour via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2020 15:41:44 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-641388903-1591717303-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
FWIW, this was something the I brought about the syntax in F2F discussion when it was first proposed (See #4338). And the resolution was to use `selector()` instead of `element()` for the exact reasons @SebastianZ  pointed out. 

Closing since there is no other action AFAICT.

GitHub Notification of comment by majido
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5166#issuecomment-641388903 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 9 June 2020 15:41:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:27:12 UTC