- From: Sebastian Zartner via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2020 20:33:11 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
There is also the `element()` function of CSS Images 4 that takes an ID selector. I think always requiring a `selector()` function is more future proof, as it explicitly marks it and allows the it to be extended to take other selectors. Allowing the selector to be placed directly _may_ cause conflicts with keywords and other syntax definitions. And of course it is more consistent to always use the same way to specify selectors. So I vote for using `selector()` in `nav-up` and Co. and replacing `element()` by `selector()`. Sebastian -- GitHub Notification of comment by SebastianZ Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5166#issuecomment-639101107 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 4 June 2020 20:33:14 UTC