- From: CSS Meeting Bot via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2020 17:57:28 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
The CSS Working Group just discussed `. [css-pseudo-4] Layering of highlight pseudo backgrounds`, and agreed to the following: * `RESOLVED: Close no change` <details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary> <dael> Topic:. [css-pseudo-4] Layering of highlight pseudo backgrounds<br> <dael> github: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4626<br> <dael> fantasai: confiming we want them to stack and layer. If yes we'll close no change<br> <dael> AmeliaBR: Makes sense for a selection on top of a spelling error<br> <dael> AmeliaBR: Looks as a highlight on top of what you've got<br> <dael> fantasai: It's on top of what you've got in element tree. It's multiple highlights<br> <dael> AmeliaBR: If you do red for spelling and transparent yellow for selection makes sense to stack<br> <dael> dbaron: Fine as long as spec which is on top<br> <dael> fantasai: Yep.<br> <dael> bkardell_: Is that a question we can ask devs what they expect?<br> <dael> fantasai: Seems everyone agrees we should layer. If there's an argument to not we can discuss<br> <dael> smfr: Apple requires layer<br> <dael> fantasai: Objections?<br> <dael> Rossen_: Objections to close no change?<br> <dael> RESOLVED: Close no change<br> </details> -- GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4626#issuecomment-572184450 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 8 January 2020 17:57:29 UTC