- From: Jeffrey Yasskin via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2020 17:50:55 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
I'm assuming Ben's comment covers "what OpenType features are present". I'd like the normative wording, possibly including both CSS and OpenType changes, to wind up being clear 1. For each font-variant value, what glyph spans it makes sense for authors to apply the value to (e.g. don't try `<span class="fraction">4,321/2,345</span>` either), and 2. That Ubuntu Mono and similar fonts are out of compliance, which might encourage UAs to disable the feature for a special-cased list of fonts. Does that make sense? Basically, ensure that authors can use the `font-variant-*` properties without investigating the detailed behavior of every font in their fallback list including the user-configured generic families. -- GitHub Notification of comment by jyasskin Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5756#issuecomment-737392151 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 2 December 2020 17:50:57 UTC