- From: Chris Lilley via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2020 00:10:00 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> https://drafts.csswg.org/css-conditional-3/#contents-of talks about @import being disallowed inside conditional rules, but doesn't use the same must language as https://drafts.csswg.org/css-conditional-3/#use. Unless there's something I'm missing about CSS editorial style, these should probably be consistent. That is because it is inside an example. The normative statement is the [definition of <stylesheet>](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-syntax-3/#typedef-stylesheet). The further explanation says that > they can accept any rule that is normally allowed at the top-level of a stylesheet, and _not otherwise restricted_ There is then an example of something (`@import`) which _is_ further restricted. Examples are not normative. Although, this particular example uses the word MUST which is bad practice and should be reworded. -- GitHub Notification of comment by svgeesus Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5697#issuecomment-736900734 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 2 December 2020 00:10:02 UTC