- From: Oriol Brufau via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2019 12:28:57 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Loirooriol has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts: == [css-grid] Resolved values of grid-template-rows/columns don't round-trip == According to @fantasai in https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4444#issuecomment-548006702, > Roundtripping getComputedStyle() values is probably the most fundamental rule about defining them. However, `grid-template-rows` and `grid-template-columns` don't always round-trip. That's because they set explicit tracks, which start just after the 1st grid line. However, when serialized, they also include implicit tracks, which may exist before the 1st grid line. ```js gridContainer.style.gridAutoRows = "1px"; gridContainer.style.gridTemplateRows = "2px"; var cs = getComputedStyle(gridContainer); cs.gridTemplateRows; // "2px" gridItem.style.gridRow = "auto / 1"; gridContainer.style.gridTemplateRows = cs.gridTemplateRows; // "1px 2px" gridContainer.style.gridTemplateRows = cs.gridTemplateRows; // "1px 1px 2px" gridContainer.style.gridTemplateRows = cs.gridTemplateRows; // "1px 1px 1px 2px" gridContainer.style.gridTemplateRows = cs.gridTemplateRows; // "1px 1px 1px 1px 2px" ``` On the one hand, knowing the final size of these implicit tracks can be useful. On the other hand, failing to round-trip sucks. Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4475 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 31 October 2019 12:28:59 UTC