- From: Behdad Esfahbod via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2019 19:33:45 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> ISTM that adding `nastaliq` as a generic font-family would not be much different from adding further names associated with particular styles of Latin typeface, which authors could reasonably want to use in order to get a certain "look" without knowing the exact names of available fonts. Are we prepared for `font-family: humanist` or `antiqua` or `egyptian` or `fraktur`? And there are probably equivalent (but quite separate) type design traditions in other scripts that would have an equal claim for recognition in CSS. I don't think we should start down this path. Exactly this. -- GitHub Notification of comment by behdad Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4397#issuecomment-547110369 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 28 October 2019 19:33:47 UTC