- From: jfkthame via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2019 08:37:44 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
ISTM that adding `nastaliq` as a generic font-family would not be much different from adding further names associated with particular styles of Latin typeface, which authors could reasonably want to use in order to get a certain "look" without knowing the exact names of available fonts. Are we prepared for `font-family: humanist` or `antiqua` or `egyptian` or `fraktur`? And there are probably equivalent (but quite separate) type design traditions in other scripts that would have an equal claim for recognition in CSS. I don't think we should start down this path. -- GitHub Notification of comment by jfkthame Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4397#issuecomment-543069887 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 17 October 2019 08:37:45 UTC