- From: George Steel via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2019 15:55:49 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
george-steel has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts: == [css-transitions-2] Animation composite order should match layout tree order == Tree order would make more sense if it went `element, ::marker, ::before, children, ::after` as this would match layout tree order. Currently the slight difference is a point of confusion and difficult to implement. Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4391 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 1 October 2019 15:55:51 UTC