- From: François REMY via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2019 16:01:20 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
FWIW proposal (c) was mainly a counter-proposal to (b) but I would totally support (a) as well. The reason behind (c) is that you can implement the [value] attribute of LI using a simple counter-set, otherwise that attribute also needs a counter-increment, and might interact negatively with other attributes. I'm not entirely convinced myself that being able to express [value=2] in pure css is worth it, but some people seemed to think so. -- GitHub Notification of comment by FremyCompany Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3686#issuecomment-472487263 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 13 March 2019 16:01:21 UTC