W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-archive@w3.org > March 2019

Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-scroll-snap] Make it more obvious that scroll-padding/scroll-margin have effects outside snap containers (#3721)

From: CSS Meeting Bot via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2019 16:06:50 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-472489771-1552493209-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
The CSS Working Group just discussed `Scroll Snap republication`, and agreed to the following:

* `RESOLVED: Publish updated CR for Scroll Snap`

<details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary>
&lt;dael> Topic: Scroll Snap republication<br>
&lt;dael> github: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3721#issuecomment-471783264<br>
&lt;dael> fantasai: Made some spec clarification to make implications easier to notice. Clearly editorial, asking for repub<br>
&lt;dael> astearns: What about the issue from jonjonjohnson?<br>
&lt;dael> fantasai: That's filed against CSSOM View spec. If that needs clarification I didn't fix anything in there. I just fixed scrollsnap<br>
&lt;dael> fantasai: Updated CR<br>
&lt;dael> astearns: There is a change list and DoC?<br>
&lt;dael> fantasai: There was only one comment which was mine. DoC seemed excessive<br>
&lt;fantasai> https://drafts.csswg.org/css-scroll-snap-1/#changes<br>
&lt;dael> astearns: SHould have a changes list so when we repub people know it's one thing<br>
&lt;dael> fantasai: Here it is ^<br>
&lt;dael> astearns: Just editorial or any test changes?<br>
&lt;florian> I have reviewed the change and support it.<br>
&lt;dael> fantasai: No normative implications. Emphasizing points on stuff we agreed<br>
&lt;dael> astearns: Comments on updating?<br>
&lt;dael> astearns: I see florian supports<br>
&lt;dael> astearns: Objection to Publish updated CR for Scroll Snap?<br>
&lt;dael> RESOLVED: Publish updated CR for Scroll Snap<br>

GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3721#issuecomment-472489771 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 13 March 2019 16:06:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 06:41:45 UTC