- From: fantasai via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2019 00:12:25 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
OK, Agenda+ to confirm a few things - Generally-speaking, do we like the new text that was added or are there concerns? - Were fragment-only URLs specially treated as unambiguous? Or do they also get reloaded as an image somehow? This isn't quite clear from the minutes. - We resolved on “should”. It's not clear what the UA is supposed to do if it disagrees with the “should”. -- GitHub Notification of comment by fantasai Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/383#issuecomment-513416574 using your GitHub account
Received on Saturday, 20 July 2019 00:12:28 UTC