W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-archive@w3.org > February 2019

Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-pseudo-4] Mark unimplemented CSSPseudoElement features at-risk (#3540)

From: CSS Meeting Bot via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2019 17:43:16 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-463295595-1550079795-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
The CSS Working Group just discussed `Mark unimplemented CSSPseudoElement features at-risk`, and agreed to the following:

* `RESOLVED: Drop style from this level, restrict API to ::before and ::after, add a note to why the other things are not yet supported`

<details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary>
&lt;dael> Topic: Mark unimplemented CSSPseudoElement features at-risk<br>
&lt;dael> github: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3540<br>
&lt;dael> fantasai: Suggestion is mark things unimplemented or drop them if no one plans to implement. No one place to impl style method. Other question is which pseudo elements do we want to support. ::selection or jsut those that generate boxes? Moz only supports ::before and ::after<br>
&lt;dael> astearns: I don't have an opinion as to which we have to support. I noticed when reading spec there are lots of others in the spec not mentioned here. It would be nice to havea note as to why others are omitted<br>
&lt;dael> fantasai: I suggest we trim spec to subset moz supports unless anyone intends to implement?<br>
&lt;leaverou> if it only supports a subset of supported pseudo-elements, that's yet another reason to not throw when other pseudos are used that are supported by the browser but not by that API<br>
&lt;dael> astearns: Obj to trim set supports to ::before and ::after?<br>
&lt;dael> fantasai: And no style<br>
&lt;dael> astearns: Objections to either<br>
&lt;dael> RESOLVED: Drop style from this level, restrict API to ::before and ::after, add a note to why the other things are not yet supported<br>
&lt;dael> fremy: Begs question to what we should do for other things browser supports. WE should say what to do with other stuff.<br>
&lt;dael> fantasai: Yeah<br>
&lt;dael> astearns: Can you add a comment to the other issue mentioning we should define that?<br>
&lt;dael> fremy: I can<br>

GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3540#issuecomment-463295595 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 13 February 2019 17:43:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 06:41:43 UTC