Why was `image-orientation: <angle>` spec-ed that way in the first place? There was a use-case for it, I assume, but I don't know what it was. By dropping the property, we throw that use-case out, no? -- GitHub Notification of comment by noell Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4164#issuecomment-525101924 using your GitHub accountReceived on Tuesday, 27 August 2019 01:54:37 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 06:41:52 UTC