Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-images] Should the values of image-orientation include the <angle> variants? (#4164)

Why was `image-orientation: <angle>` spec-ed that way in the first place?  There was a use-case for it, I assume, but I don't know what it was.  By dropping the property, we throw that use-case out, no?

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by noell
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4164#issuecomment-525101924 using your GitHub account

Received on Tuesday, 27 August 2019 01:54:37 UTC