- From: r12a via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2019 15:19:53 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Somehow i missed this request for i18n feedback, but I'm wondering whether there was a particular reason that that label was added to this issue. Nothing is coming to mind that applies here. I also would have naively expected the `auto` alternation to be between `none` and `all`, rather than `none` and `first`. If `auto` is used for that alternation, it would generally produce `first`/`all` most of the time, since `none` would only be applied when the para starts with a single-letter word. That somehow seems back-to-front for me. (Looking at examples, i noted that another approach here is to use `none` and capitalise the remainder of a word if it is more than one letter long.) I don't know whether that's of any help. -- GitHub Notification of comment by r12a Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/410#issuecomment-524355768 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 23 August 2019 15:19:55 UTC