W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-archive@w3.org > July 2018

Re: [csswg-drafts] [selectors4] Name the “functional pseudo-class like :matches() with 0 specificity”

From: Thomas ZILLIOX via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2018 19:36:16 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-408211139-1532633775-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
@jonathantneal I don't see the cons about a pseudo-class that is "explicitly not extended-able". Can you give some context?

`:nil()` and `:zero()` seems to be the only ones where it will be clear "why we used this pseudo-selector". So they've got my vote.

GitHub Notification of comment by tzi
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2143#issuecomment-408211139 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 26 July 2018 19:36:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:26:51 UTC