Are you sure? It's `a b { & c d, e f & { } }`. Shouldn't it be expanded to `:matches(a b) c d, e f :matches(a b)` according to your rule? Why do all of c/d/e/f need to appear? -- GitHub Notification of comment by upsuper Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2881#issuecomment-402720711 using your GitHub accountReceived on Thursday, 5 July 2018 13:25:14 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 5 July 2018 13:25:15 UTC