- From: Xidorn Quan via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2018 13:25:11 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Are you sure? It's `a b { & c d, e f & { } }`. Shouldn't it be expanded to `:matches(a b) c d, e f :matches(a b)` according to your rule? Why do all of c/d/e/f need to appear?
--
GitHub Notification of comment by upsuper
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2881#issuecomment-402720711 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 5 July 2018 13:25:14 UTC