Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-nesting] Concern about combinatorial explosion

Are you sure? It's `a b { & c d, e f & { } }`. Shouldn't it be expanded to `:matches(a b) c d, e f :matches(a b)` according to your rule? Why do all of c/d/e/f need to appear?

GitHub Notification of comment by upsuper
Please view or discuss this issue at using your GitHub account

Received on Thursday, 5 July 2018 13:25:14 UTC