- From: Amelia Bellamy-Royds via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2018 16:37:24 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
@tabatkins Oh, that's a nice result. I think it's reasonably to only accept the legacy whitespace parsing behavior with the legacy no-units syntax. I would be happy to go further and say that the complete attribute has to either be strictly in the modern syntax or strictly in the legacy syntax: but it would be nice if both syntaxes were supported! Would it be possible to define the syntax of the attribute as `<transform-list>|<legacy-transform-list>` and then build it up from there as a full CSS parsing syntax? Or would other differences (like whitespace between the keyword and the parenthesis) make that fall apart? -- GitHub Notification of comment by AmeliaBR Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2623#issuecomment-385454843 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 30 April 2018 16:37:26 UTC