- From: fantasai via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2018 21:47:11 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Yeah, I think we should handle this by just fixing the places where CSS2 still points at CSS2.0 to point at CSS2.1, as we intended when we merged the shortnames. What we did is not intrinsically different from taking a REC back to WD and then putting it back in REC again; this is different from superseding a REC, it's maintenance of the REC. We will use the superseded status on CSS2 once we've finished replacing it with CSS3 modules and no longer need to maintain it. -- GitHub Notification of comment by fantasai Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2589#issuecomment-384799290 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 26 April 2018 21:47:15 UTC