- From: Emilio Cobos Álvarez via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2018 08:52:14 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Looks like safari does return keywords here, that is `font-stretch: 150%` computes to `extra-expanded`, so there's no interop here. Any opinion about what's the best thing here? Safari's behavior seems more backwards-compatible, but Chrome's is probably simpler. Also, note that Chrome does go back to keywords when needed to serialize the font shorthand. -- GitHub Notification of comment by emilio Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2605#issuecomment-383502384 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 23 April 2018 08:52:16 UTC