Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-flex] Min-content sizing currently too smart to be web compatible?

The Working Group just discussed `Min-content sizing currently too smart to be web compatible?`, and agreed to the following resolutions:

* `RESOLVED: Accept the proposal`

<details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary>
&lt;dael> Topic: Min-content sizing currently too smart to be web compatible?<br>
&lt;dael> github: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2353<br>
&lt;dael> fremy: The issue was that...min-content by default when you can shrink could shrink to the min-content. Web expected width as well. I reviewed the change and it seems right, but the summary was missing details.<br>
&lt;dael> fremy: Still means you have elements that could shrink further but will not. I'm fine with the change how written.<br>
&lt;dael> Rossen: What's the summary?<br>
&lt;dael> fantasai: We made the min-content contribution of the flex item consider width and height.<br>
&lt;dael> ??: Does it match what min-width auto computes to?<br>
&lt;dael> fremy: Spec changed the minimum size all the time. Width works anyway.<br>
&lt;Rossen> s/??/biesinger/<br>
&lt;dael> fantasai: Because if we change how min-width auto works it would change how ti shrinks down<br>
&lt;Rossen> s/biesinger/cbiesinger/<br>
&lt;dael> fantasai: We had to do it through the min-content contribute tion through auto because the web depends on it.<br>
&lt;dael> Rossen: Prop resolution is accept this change?<br>
&lt;dael> fremy: The width and heigh property does effect min-content contribution, right?<br>
&lt;dael> fantasai: Yeah.<br>
&lt;dael> cbiesinger: We don't impl min0size contribution per spec. Does anyone?<br>
&lt;dael> Rossen: We're close. We had reworking recently and since we were close to shipping we had to pull back due to unexpected side effects. This is part of the changes.<br>
&lt;dael> Rossen: So, kind of.<br>
&lt;dael> cbiesinger: You find it web compat?<br>
&lt;dael> fremy: We won't know unitl we do this fix and try again.<br>
&lt;dael> cbiesinger: Can you prioritize?<br>
&lt;dael> Rossen: Yes fingers cross.<br>
&lt;dael> Rossen: Obj?<br>
&lt;cbiesinger> s/min0size contribution/intrinsic size computation/<br>
&lt;cbiesinger> s/Can yoy/I should/<br>
&lt;dael> RESOLVED: Accept the proposal<br>
</details>


-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2353#issuecomment-380705263 using your GitHub account

Received on Thursday, 12 April 2018 07:25:45 UTC