- From: Tab Atkins Jr. via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2018 21:53:16 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
No, it's fixed. The discussion history was a bit confusing, tho: 1. Initially place-items was just `<'align-items'> <'justify-items'>`. 2. In <https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/595#issuecomment-253286749> Mats points out the grammar is ambiguous and suggests using a `/` between the terms. 3. In <https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1002> fantasai offers up a slightly different usage of the `/` to avoid needing it for the common case (so it's more like the slash usage in border-radius). 4. In <https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1001> fantasai offers a different suggestion entirely, that of just specifying the relative order of the overflow and position keywords (at this time they could be given in either order, leading to the grammar ambiguity Mats found). This ends up being accepted by the WG. 5. There was some confusion around this time due to some incomplete/incorrect edits. 6. Last week we were doing a round of edits on this spec, realized that now that #1001 is resolved on, the grammar ambiguity is indeed gone, and we can return to the original, simple grammar. -- GitHub Notification of comment by tabatkins Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2276#issuecomment-378757319 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 4 April 2018 21:53:20 UTC