W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-archive@w3.org > October 2017

Re: [csswg-drafts] [cssom-view] New feature - scroll-boundary-behavior (an extension of -ms-scroll-chaining)

From: Benoit Girard via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2017 06:04:47 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-337127190-1508220286-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
I think there's some good points here. But I would like to note that `overflow: none` is logical (there's no overflow), while `scroll-boundary: none` would mean that there's no scroll boundary which to me is illogical and inconsistent with `scroll-boundary-behavior: none` which is logical to me but maybe just because I've been looking at this for months now. Similarly for `scroll-behavior: none`.

Another example: `display: none` is logical while `display-behavior: none` is confusing. I think for that reason it's not that same as adding `-behavior` to existing properties. Is that argument convincing?

I do somewhat like `scroll-overflow` but I think `scroll-boundary-behavior` is more describe. I agree that a short memorable name can be preferable however.

I think a better place to discuss this would be under a new issue in the repo: 

GitHub Notification of comment by bgirard
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/769#issuecomment-337127190 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 17 October 2017 06:05:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 06:41:19 UTC