- From: Benoit Girard via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2017 06:04:47 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
I think there's some good points here. But I would like to note that `overflow: none` is logical (there's no overflow), while `scroll-boundary: none` would mean that there's no scroll boundary which to me is illogical and inconsistent with `scroll-boundary-behavior: none` which is logical to me but maybe just because I've been looking at this for months now. Similarly for `scroll-behavior: none`. Another example: `display: none` is logical while `display-behavior: none` is confusing. I think for that reason it's not that same as adding `-behavior` to existing properties. Is that argument convincing? I do somewhat like `scroll-overflow` but I think `scroll-boundary-behavior` is more describe. I agree that a short memorable name can be preferable however. I think a better place to discuss this would be under a new issue in the repo: https://github.com/WICG/scroll-boundary-behavior -- GitHub Notification of comment by bgirard Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/769#issuecomment-337127190 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 17 October 2017 06:05:42 UTC