- From: Lea Verou via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2017 20:28:32 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Exactly what @kizu and @FremyCompany said. This kind of thing is needed yesterday, so complicating it further really doesn't help. If some specificity is desired, one can always make it so by using `:is()` for only a part of their selector (which I assume is how most people will use it, putting only the filters in `:is()`). -- GitHub Notification of comment by LeaVerou Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1170#issuecomment-333655064 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 2 October 2017 20:28:22 UTC