W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-archive@w3.org > November 2017

Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-multicol] Referring to the multicol element / container

From: CSS Meeting Bot via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2017 17:43:01 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-346424523-1511372580-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
The Working Group just discussed `Referring to the multicol element / container`, and agreed to the following resolutions:

* `RESOLVED: Use multicolumn container in the draft`

<details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary>
&lt;dael> Topic: Referring to the multicol element / container<br>
&lt;dael> github: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1965<br>
&lt;rego> no interop at all on this last issue; checking edge, chrome and firefox each one has a different output<br>
&lt;dael> rachelandrew: This is...it poss doesn't need a resolution. When we disucssed at the F2F fantasai noted there's confusion as to what we call the element. I'm proposing we call it the multicol container which matches flexbox or grid.<br>
&lt;dael> rachelandrew: I wanted to check if there are problems.<br>
&lt;dael> fantasai: I think it's a necessary change. It's not an element, it's a box.<br>
&lt;dael> rachelandrew: Cool. If people are happy, I'm working through the spec so this seemed the right time.<br>
&lt;dael> astearns: Comments or concerns?<br>
&lt;dael> Rossen_: Sounds like a good change.<br>
&lt;tantek> +1<br>
&lt;dael> astearns: Objections to using multicolumn container in the draft?<br>
&lt;dael> RESOLVED: Use multicolumn container in the draft<br>
&lt;dael> fantasai: new topic...back to grid.<br>
</details>


-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1965#issuecomment-346424523 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 22 November 2017 17:43:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 22 November 2017 17:43:06 UTC