- From: Roman Komarov via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2017 08:04:17 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
@adamsilver I'm not sure why you have chosen this passive aggressive tone which can easily derail the conversation. Try not to do this. That said, if the “interactive element” would be introduced, then its definition should be added somewhere in the specs too. However, there is a chance that people from the csswg could reformulate this in a different manner, in a way that would be clearer and more understandable. The example in my proposal is just an example, a draft. Not the final version. So, if you'd like to be constructive, you could try to think about the idea of this issue and not about the wording. -- GitHub Notification of comment by kizu Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1936#issuecomment-341955774 using your GitHub account
Received on Sunday, 5 November 2017 08:04:20 UTC