W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-archive@w3.org > May 2017

Re: [csswg-drafts] [selectors3] better terminology for ~ sibling combinator?

From: inoas via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 16 May 2017 00:43:18 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-301643217-1494895397-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
I know it is a bit more verbose but for sure clear?

`Next-Immediate-Sibling Combinator`
`Any-Following-Sibling Combinator`

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by inoas
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1382#issuecomment-301643217 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 16 May 2017 00:43:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 10:12:53 UTC