- From: Florian Rivoal via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2017 06:12:59 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> [...] that doesn't mean subgrid is ready to be enshrined with CR status. Unlike the rest of the Grid spec, which is now implemented (for the most part) in two major browsers, the spec for subgrid has not been battle-tested like that and it's better for everyone if it remains in draft status, as I argued in the OP. > > Subgrid is both an important feature (we should try hard to get it right) and also a rather complex feature (it's unlikely that we'll get it right before starting to actually implement it). I see no benefits at all to freezing the feature in its current form before we have actual implementation feedback. > CR does not mean frozen and will not change regardless of implementation feedback. As @fantasai said, it means “we can't do anything more to improve this feature without implementation, and don't expect any changes unless they come from implementation feedback, so please try to implement it”. So when you say that it needs implementation feedback to make it better, this does not contradict the fact that this is in CR, it reinforces it. I completely agree that subgrid is nowhere near ready to **exit** CR, unlike the rest of the spec which is getting there, but that's why it is marked at risk. Assuming, which seems likely, that the implementations of the rest of the spec reach sufficient quality to exit CR and move onto REC while subgrid remains unimplemented (or incompletely so), it will probably be pushed to the next level. But until then, what CR does seem the right level, and I don't see what harm it does being at that level. -- GitHub Notification of comment by frivoal Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/958#issuecomment-277172729 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 3 February 2017 06:13:07 UTC