W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-archive@w3.org > September 2016

Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-images][css-masking][paint] Ambiguities in handling url()

From: Amelia Bellamy-Royds via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2016 15:04:59 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-248019636-1474297483-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Re which properties currently have image-vs-element ambiguities:

Marker does not accept a plain image type, so there's no ambiguity 
there.  [Ambiguous URL properties I've 
 that are currently supported in at least some browsers are `mask` and
 `cursor`; although we've deprecated the SVG `<cursor>` element, it's 
still supposed to be supported by user agents.  The new SVG text 
layout also makes `shape-inside`  and `shape-subtract` ambiguous. 

In other words, `mask` should be the main focus for web compatibility 
issues.  If no browsers currently support external file mask element 
references, that could be an argument for making special rules for 
same-document fragments.  However, I think the more powerful argument 
is that `mask-image` is a new & still experimental property, that [is 
not supported un-prefixed in any stable 
browsers](http://caniuse.com/#search=mask), while mask with element 
references is well supported in SVG.

GitHub Notification of comment by AmeliaBR
Please view or discuss this issue at 
using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 19 September 2016 15:05:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 06:41:03 UTC