- From: James Craig via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2016 01:24:50 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> I'd like to get feedback about this from somebody who knows about the various disabilities that lead various people to seek one or the other of these settings. If they are the same, or at least if there is no conflict, this kind of merging could be a good thing. In our experience, they are used for the same purpose, but both are not necessarily used by the same people (some use both, others don't). Low vision disabilities are too diverse to make sweeping generalizations like, "People who what higher contrast text also want zero transparency" but it might be okay to generalize an interface change such as: "If the only relevant CSS media feature is `prefers-increased-contrast` then as the web page author, maybe I should make both the color contrast change and the opacity change." It's also possible that people just don't use both simultaneously to avoid existing implementation bugs, and that they'd enable both once the remaining bugs are fixed in first-, second-, and third-party app. For example, a popular app that rhymes with Zulu can look bad when you enable 'reduce transparency' on tvOS. -- GitHub Notification of comment by cookiecrook Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/443#issuecomment-245147480 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 7 September 2016 01:24:58 UTC