Re: [csswg-drafts] [selectors-4] should the >> syntax for the descendant combinator still exist?

> I believe at this point having two syntaxes for the same thing would
 reduce clarity.

I can see that this might be the case if both combinators are mixed 
within style sheets, though my argument that `a >> b` is more explicit
 is still valid.


GitHub Notification of comment by SebastianZ
Please view or discuss this issue at 
using your GitHub account

Received on Tuesday, 15 November 2016 08:27:02 UTC