W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-archive@w3.org > November 2016

Re: [csswg-drafts] [selectors-4] should the >> syntax for the descendant combinator still exist?

From: Sebastian Zartner via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 08:26:56 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-260577827-1479198415-sysbot+gh@w3.org> 
> I believe at this point having two syntaxes for the same thing would
 reduce clarity.

I can see that this might be the case if both combinators are mixed 
within style sheets, though my argument that `a >> b` is more explicit
 is still valid.

Sebastian

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by SebastianZ
Please view or discuss this issue at 
https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/641#issuecomment-260577827 
using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 15 November 2016 08:27:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 06:41:05 UTC