Re: [csswg-drafts] [selectors-4] should the >> syntax for the descendant combinator still exist?

Adding one data point:
according to http://caniuse.com/#search=%3E%3E Safari 10 and Safari 
Technology Preview
already implements `>>`.

As I tested on my local OSX, `>>` did not work on Safari 10.0.1, but 
it DID work on Safari TP 16.


-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by TakayoshiKochi
Please view or discuss this issue at 
https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/641#issuecomment-260544659 
using your GitHub account

Received on Tuesday, 15 November 2016 04:29:54 UTC